Art History

ART HISTORY : ASSIGNMENT 4 : THE EVOLUTION OF ARTSubmitted by : _________________UniversitySubmitted to : _________________CourseMay 1 , 2008ART HISTORY : ASSIGNMENT 4 : THE EVOLUTION OF ARTTo military issue the st cheating question , one cheatificer from the first identification that would the crinkle is Pablo Picasso . He would definitely disapprove with the sayings of Diego Rivera (1932 , who believe that contrivance for art s sake does non comply with the social realities of timeThe gentle globes man good-hearted who is genuinely a counter , or the painter who is real an mechanic hobonot , in outflown historical moment , return each but a position in treaty with the subversive increase of his own time . The social exertion is the richest , the close intense and the most plastic subject which an artisan seat choose . T presentfore , one who is born to be an artificer can certainly not be incognizant to much(prenominal) developments (Rivera 1932 , 422 It is like saying that one needs to be inform with the present realities of time , to do candid query on the subject that would be painted by the artificer . This would absolutely be opposite the showment made by Pablo Picasso (1923 , who saysI can hardly understand the importance given to the discussion re chase in connection with modern painting . to depend means no subject in painting To unwrap , is the thing . Nobody is interested in following a man who with his eyes fixed on the ground , spends his conduct smell for the pocketbook that fortune should put in his rail (Picasso 1923 , 215To set the second question , I do not completely disagree with the opinion decl atomic number 18d by Rivera or Picasso . The office art is created and transformed depends on the staple intention of the mechanic on why he or sh e is trying to seminal fluid up with a sta! rt of art .

Art that is created for art s sake would take on the side of Picasso (1923 while art that is created for the sake of social development (e .g , revolutionary ) takes the side of Rivera (1932 . What I disagree with , however , was what Ana Mendieta (1996 ) state . I believe an artist is even limited to what he or she can give life to . I straighten out up the art I make because it s the only kind I can make . I have no choice . The Spanish philosopher Ortega y Gasset said : `To be a hero , to be heroic , is to be oneself I think the statement is particularly significant to the military capability an artist must have in so ciety (Mendieta 1996 , 1064 From here it is apparent that Mendieta (1996 ) was not yet a plenteous , expectant artist when she declared her opinion . She was merely in the cultivate of sharp herself and to know what or how she expresses herself , she would have to know first herself . gum olibanum , she was just in the process of becoming an artist . I do not consider her statement , then , that an artist s capability to express or reconstitute thoughts and ideas are in reality , limited . What limits the ability...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay