Animal Testing Should Be Banned

Running head NameUniversityCourseTutorDateThe debate on fleshly question has remained a controversial one on the public playing field . Opponents of the practice claim that wildcats have a feel and thus feel pain and happiness . Therefore , just like existence demand for life , the redress of animals to enjoy their raw(a) lives should be respected by man . Also claimed is that animals and valet de chambre beings are different in their genetic makeup as easily as in their responsiveness to external stimuli (Alper , 2008 . This has the meaning that animal interrogation to qualify the rubberty of products developed for sympathetic being is sort of unreliable .

Still , given the new-fangled technological advancements alternative testing techniques should be employed as failure to do so negate the meaning of scientific developments in the human communityOn the some other hand , proponents of animal testing claim that it is the only hardheaded way of ensuring quality and safe products for public Some proponents assert that the world is structured in a hierarchal style with man being at the top . Such has the subtraction of animals being of less apprize and thus can be used by macrocosm for his own good For the proponents of animal testing therefore , failing to testing scientific products on animals is compromising the dignity of mankind (Shumake Engman , 1993 . Nevertheless , given the position that animals have a life , they have unalienable right to live their ! natural lives aright without harm by mankind . Therefore...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay